Dramatic SFB: Campaign Tweaks

[Roch Chartrand]

I'm good with this, it meet my thinking on the subject!

 

Roch C.

 

From: SFBdrama [mailto:sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org] On Behalf Of
Matthew via SFBdrama
Sent: 15 octobre 2017 01:40
To: Matthew via SFBdrama
Subject: Dramatic SFB: Campaign Tweaks

 

On 10/10/2017 06:54 PM, Ann Monaghan wrote:



Make it an option where both Admirals must agree to use hidden TBs, if one
says no, then hidden TBs is not used.


The campaign rules have stated
<http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org/docs/rules.html#sfb%20rules>  that we are using
the Secret Placement of Mines (M2.6). I'll mention that the rule allows
mines laid out the hatch to be secret (you do this in the client by making
the mine "hidden" in the dialog during placement) but does not allow mines
delivered by transporter to be secret. If the players want to change this,
then the rules make all mines public. There will not be a "middle ground".
where the players decide differently for each scenario. One way or the
other, guys.

--Matt



---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20171015/31263fa2/attachment-0002.html>