Dramatic SFB: Age of PFs: Base 1842

[Majead Farsi]

Carnivon are RTA.

On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 01:21, Matt via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
wrote:

>
> ... you decided not to "consider" sending your lone cruiser to attack my
> carrier group?
>
>
> Hmm.. At first, I thought I would get a BATS on that one. Then I did some
> math, thought I would get a BS, and figured I would let you have it.
>
>
> Then I forgot about it....
>
>
> Now that you've reminded me about it, I see that the ISG refit I thought
> bumped me past it is actually one I don't have yet. Coupled with some
> weasel-wording in the scenario, I could probably have a BATS if the HPM is
> actually a PAM. ("*The PAM *may* be replaced with a HPM if the scenario
> year is Y178 or greater.*" Emphasis mine.) Otherwise the BATS is 15 BPV
> over the quarter-attackers-BPV mark.
>
>
> Given that, It looks real attractive to fight it. I'm not sure that I
> could win, even with a BATS. But I might kill something before you drive me
> off.
>
>
> So. Two questions come to mind:
>
> - Do you think it's legit to not upgrade the PAM to an HPM? (e.g. will you
> let me get away with it?) It could set a precedence (either way), and I
> won't be upset at all if it's in your mind that it constitutes a "thou
> shalt have an HPM if the year allows."
>
> - Do you have some time to shake loose to let me shoot at you?
>
>
> --Matt
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20200812/07a34a99/attachment-0002.html>