Dramatic SFB: Age of PFs: Base 1842

[Matt]

> ... you decided not to "consider" sending your lone cruiser to attack 
> my carrier group?


Hmm.. At first, I thought I would get a BATS on that one. Then I did 
some math, thought I would get a BS, and figured I would let you have it.


Then I forgot about it....


Now that you've reminded me about it, I see that the ISG refit I thought 
bumped me past it is actually one I don't have yet. Coupled with some 
weasel-wording in the scenario, I could probably have a BATS if the HPM 
is actually a PAM. ("/The PAM **may** be replaced with a HPM if the 
scenario year is Y178 or greater./" Emphasis mine.) Otherwise the BATS 
is 15 BPV over the quarter-attackers-BPV mark.


Given that, It looks real attractive to fight it. I'm not sure that I 
could win, even with a BATS. But I might kill something before you drive 
me off.


So. Two questions come to mind:

- Do you think it's legit to not upgrade the PAM to an HPM? (e.g. will 
you let me get away with it?) It could set a precedence (either way), 
and I won't be upset at all if it's in your mind that it constitutes a 
"thou shalt have an HPM if the year allows."

- Do you have some time to shake loose to let me shoot at you?


--Matt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20200811/c45e089b/attachment-0002.html>