Dramatic SFB: Age of PFs: Base 1842

[Drew Klenotic]

I think something like that should probably get more input from people 
not involved in the battle and invested in the decision.

On 2020-08-11 20:21, Matt via SFBdrama wrote:
>> ... you decided not to "consider" sending your lone cruiser to
>> attack my carrier group?
> 
> Hmm.. At first, I thought I would get a BATS on that one. Then I did
> some math, thought I would get a BS, and figured I would let you have
> it.
> 
> Then I forgot about it....
> 
> Now that you've reminded me about it, I see that the ISG refit I
> thought bumped me past it is actually one I don't have yet. Coupled
> with some weasel-wording in the scenario, I could probably have a BATS
> if the HPM is actually a PAM. ("_The PAM *MAY* be replaced with a HPM
> if the scenario year is Y178 or greater._" Emphasis mine.) Otherwise
> the BATS is 15 BPV over the quarter-attackers-BPV mark.
> 
> Given that, It looks real attractive to fight it. I'm not sure that I
> could win, even with a BATS. But I might kill something before you
> drive me off.
> 
> So. Two questions come to mind:
> 
> - Do you think it's legit to not upgrade the PAM to an HPM? (e.g. will
> you let me get away with it?) It could set a precedence (either way),
> and I won't be upset at all if it's in your mind that it constitutes a
> "thou shalt have an HPM if the year allows."
> 
> - Do you have some time to shake loose to let me shoot at you?
> 
> --Matt
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org