Dramatic SFB: Campaign Rules

[Majead Farsi]

Its fine by me Matt as attackers should always have a min WS2.

On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, 00:45 Matt via SFBdrama, <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
wrote:

> The Age of PFs is about to cycle, pending some last-minute stuff from
> some people.
>
>
> One of those things is a rules change I would like to put forward. This
> change would add a note to the die-roll chart near the back of the rules
> to state that the attacker getting WS-I would instead get WS-II. Thus
> the attacker cannot ever get WS-I except by some change to WS by a
> scenario.
>
> An attacker without a scout would get WS-II half the time and WS-III
> half the time. An attacker with a scout would get WS-II a third of the
> time and WS-III two thirds of the time. (Attackers with scouts have the
> same odds before the edit.)
>
> Defenders still get WS-I a third of the time without the scout and
> one-sixth of the time with a scout. This is slightly offset by the fact
> that the defender sometimes is given a scout for free (MBs, BSCs, etc)
> and also by the defender getting free units (and thus usually some free
> guns.)
>
>
> --Matt
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20200801/5cc385f8/attachment-0002.html>