Dramatic SFB: Late War T4

[Gregory Flusche]

Matt could we just buy them like ships?  Put in the cost of PFs? Then one
could assign them were ever they could?

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:07 AM Randy Blair via SFBdrama <
sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019, 10:02 AM Matt <matt at mattnet.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Randy Blair wrote:
>> >
>> > 1.  I really hate the SFBOL client.  It just sucks and I hate it.
>> > When I play, I lose simply because it aggravates me to no end.  This
>> > is not the campaign's fault.
>>
>>
>> I agree it's not perfect. I hope to visit Ohio sometime and get some
>> face-to-face time with you. Until then, I'm stuck with this.
>>
>
> Indiana.
> Fort Wayne, Indiana.
>
>>
>>
>> > 2.  The scenarios border on boring or unrealistic.  How many moray
>> > eels are there, anyway?  (One example...I can come up with many.) This
>> > is the campaign's fault.
>>
>>
>> I can adjust the frequency of the scenarios. Monster scenarios are on
>> the moderate-to-low side of showing up. Convoy and Colony raids are on
>> the moderate-to-high side of showing up. There are others, which tend to
>> happen less commonly. This includes the "Death Star" scenario, the
>> rarest of them all, where the defender's force is largely based on
>> moon-based attrition units.
>>
>>
>> > 3.  It seems really hard to get people together to play. For 6 months
>> > I could play every single night while I was at work, and it was very
>> > difficult to schedule time with my opponents.  Now that I'm back on
>> > first shift, it's pretty much impossible for me to play again.  But
>> > I'm ok with farming out my battles.  I think like an Admiral anyway.
>>
>>
>> I have no problem with someone who can only be an admiral or someone who
>> only cares to be a captain. We can share the load or, as the campaign
>> rules suggests, go to SIDCORS.
>>
>>
>> > 4.  Yes, the rewards are not worth fighting over, honestly.  The only
>> > time I bother is when I can actually lose income by not showing up.
>> > It used to be that a very challenging scenario gave you a recurring
>> > income bonus, and that was pretty fun to play and grow.  Once that
>> > went away, I lost interest, but tried to keep the spirit anyway.
>>
>>
>> I enjoyed those too. The code is still there to do income growth. I've
>> been considering putting that back in, but for very small income boosts
>> (5-15 income per scenario)
>>
>
> Yes.
> Do that, please.
> Those should be for fixed assets like planets and ground bases.
>
>
>>
>> > 5.  I think PFs should be purchased as they are lost, just like in F&E.
>>
>>
>> I made a decision early in the software that recurring-costs would be a
>> headache. I also shied away from some sort of inventory-tracking system.
>> Without either or both of those, your proposal can't be done. Sorry man.
>>
>>
>> --Matt
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20190324/71fb3a6b/attachment-0002.html>