Dramatic SFB: Finishing Fleet Build

[Randy Blair]

Yeah, there would have to be some mechanism by which you could only get so
many of those.

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018, 10:10 AM Don Lavanty via SFBdrama <
sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org wrote:

> No thanks on the negative points you could be unfortunate enough to get
> all 8 missions defence and you are basically just out of the game just
> because of the RNG.
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:00 AM Charles Carroll via SFBdrama <
> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>
>> It would work fine like that. But then there is no way to lose border
>> that so not sure if that is a viable answer.
>>
>> Chuck.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 5:13 PM Gregory Flusche <shagrat1960 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Matt could you make a non player race? That when some one attacks a non
>>> border and closes it it would open a border with the non player race.
>>> Giving a player a free border only needing to assign a ship there to gain
>>> the EPs? Are is that not possible with your program?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:43 PM Charles Carroll via SFBdrama <
>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lol yeah I over do it at times.
>>>>
>>>> Ok in a nutshell. No Borders are bad bad bad.
>>>>
>>>> The only reason to try and take a border is if you absolutely need to
>>>> reduce your combat area because it is hurting you too badly to have that
>>>> much area to defend.
>>>>
>>>> So no one ever fights a No Border scenario because they gain nothing
>>>> and lose every possible point the could make in the future. It is a
>>>> lose/lose Pyrrhic Victory where winning hurts you as much or more than him.
>>>>
>>>> Marcel's idea of must defend or you lose enough income to be hurt.
>>>> And/or the idea of a negative balance means you must kill a ship of equal
>>>> or lessor value or several ships to pay the cost would work better. As in
>>>> considering that all ships require some upkeep and maintenance and if your
>>>> balance is negative then you cannot support all your ships.
>>>>
>>>> So this is why there is an issue with the idea.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:29 PM Matthew via SFBdrama <
>>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry Charles, but your email rambled along in a fashion that I
>>>>> wasn't able to follow your line of thinking. Would you please try that
>>>>> again?
>>>>>
>>>>> --Matt
>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________
>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20181225/56dcf587/attachment-0002.html>