Dramatic SFB: Finishing Fleet Build

[Don Lavanty]

No thanks on the negative points you could be unfortunate enough to get all
8 missions defence and you are basically just out of the game just because
of the RNG.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:00 AM Charles Carroll via SFBdrama <
sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:

> It would work fine like that. But then there is no way to lose border that
> so not sure if that is a viable answer.
>
> Chuck.
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 5:13 PM Gregory Flusche <shagrat1960 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Matt could you make a non player race? That when some one attacks a non
>> border and closes it it would open a border with the non player race.
>> Giving a player a free border only needing to assign a ship there to gain
>> the EPs? Are is that not possible with your program?
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:43 PM Charles Carroll via SFBdrama <
>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Lol yeah I over do it at times.
>>>
>>> Ok in a nutshell. No Borders are bad bad bad.
>>>
>>> The only reason to try and take a border is if you absolutely need to
>>> reduce your combat area because it is hurting you too badly to have that
>>> much area to defend.
>>>
>>> So no one ever fights a No Border scenario because they gain nothing and
>>> lose every possible point the could make in the future. It is a lose/lose
>>> Pyrrhic Victory where winning hurts you as much or more than him.
>>>
>>> Marcel's idea of must defend or you lose enough income to be hurt.
>>> And/or the idea of a negative balance means you must kill a ship of equal
>>> or lessor value or several ships to pay the cost would work better. As in
>>> considering that all ships require some upkeep and maintenance and if your
>>> balance is negative then you cannot support all your ships.
>>>
>>> So this is why there is an issue with the idea.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:29 PM Matthew via SFBdrama <
>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm sorry Charles, but your email rambled along in a fashion that I
>>>> wasn't able to follow your line of thinking. Would you please try that
>>>> again?
>>>>
>>>> --Matt
>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________
>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20181225/4df168cf/attachment-0002.html>