Dramatic SFB: WoA

[Charles Carroll]

Hell as a Romulan in most games I obviously love plasma and nothing says Hi
and welcome to death better than a Sabot. But that certainly ups the Plasma
races game a notch above most other races. Even though at that
level...everyone ends up with X ships.

Maybe start a bit lower and in 5 years...or so get there? I dont know.

Chuck

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:59 PM Paul Meyer via SFBdrama <
sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:

> As I may have mentioned earlier, I'd be up for a new start. My only
> request would be to have it in Y180 or later. I'd like to play with the
> sabot plasmas... 😊
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* SFBdrama <sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org> on behalf of joshua
> s via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 28, 2018 9:56 PM
> *To:* sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> *Subject:* Re: Dramatic SFB: WoA
>
> I have no preference on whether a new game is started or not.
>
> I’m not for any fix that would arbitrarily force players to fight as that
> isn’t the issue of the static circumstances the campaign is in.
>
> If we wish to fix it the only plausible solution is to limit treaties,
> though I suspect that will be done anyways due to the issues it caused.
>
> That’s my two cents.
> Josh
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think the answer is we need to start a new game. And...we need some
> adjustment to the rules. To make combat more required or at least make
> there be some penalty for sending ships and just running away if you are
> not severely outgunned. Its one thing to have half his BPV. Its another to
> face...50 to 100 point difference and just run.
>
> Anyway. Just need some modifications and this should make the game better.
> Maybe even make it where you cannot have more than 1 or two treaties. Based
> on simple reality. Obviously this would require the honor system. But
> realistically...if we always see no fights. And each side always gets their
> defend sites. Well that says something. We are ending up with just building
> bigger and bigger fleets that never get to fight. Pretty much a waste at
> this point since even with a monster fleet. If you are 100 points down the
> fight ends before it begins.
>
> Chuck
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:32 PM joshua s via SFBdrama <
> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>
> I’m sad to see you go. I really enjoyed your AAR’s. Both you and Paul have
> a gift!
>
> Josh
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Boyd Steere via SFBdrama <
> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>
> I've enjoyed this campaign a lot and learned so much about the game
> through it.  But I too look at my borders and conclude that it is now a
> game of long, allied borders generating floods of BPV from defense-only
> bidding, or engagements with fleets too giant for me to effectively play
> (especially as drone-heavy Kzinti).  I am ready to end my participation and
> say good game.
>
> I understand that this condition is the result of my choices to make many
> alliances and few enemies.  Of course, my choices were influenced by having
> adversaries who also had large alliances and could thereby concentrate
> heavy fleets against me.
>
> I will withdraw from all contested border engagements, of which there is
> now only one or two.  It's been fantastic playing with you, and I wish you
> all well!
>
> Cheers,
> Boyd, Territorial Marking Fleet
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 8:31 AM Paul Meyer via SFBdrama <
> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>
> For my two cents, I'm ready to start a new campaign. My borders and fleets
> are so big, I somehow forgot to deploy most of my capitol ships. With the
> majority of my cruisers and DNs in dock, I'll have to forfeit most of my
> scenarios this round.
>
>
> More details to follow...
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* SFBdrama <sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org> on behalf of
> Matthew via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 20, 2018 7:47 PM
> *To:* sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> *Subject:* Re: Dramatic SFB: WoA
>
> > ...  this type campaign because there is no real way to win.
>
> Officially, you win by knocking everyone else out of the campaign
> (through NOBORDER rewards.) In a practical sense, you win by being one
> of the guys still standing whenever the game comes to a close.
>
> > ... and Matt loves feed back
>
> Indeed I do. There's half a dozen scenarios in the mix that someone else
> made.
>
> --Matt
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20181128/a442b035/attachment-0002.html>