Dramatic SFB: WoA

[Paul Meyer]

As I may have mentioned earlier, I'd be up for a new start. My only request would be to have it in Y180 or later. I'd like to play with the sabot plasmas... 😊


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>


________________________________
From: SFBdrama <sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org> on behalf of joshua s via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 9:56 PM
To: sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org
Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: WoA

I have no preference on whether a new game is started or not.

I’m not for any fix that would arbitrarily force players to fight as that isn’t the issue of the static circumstances the campaign is in.

If we wish to fix it the only plausible solution is to limit treaties, though I suspect that will be done anyways due to the issues it caused.

That’s my two cents.
Josh

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 28, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com<mailto:mastrvran at gmail.com>> wrote:

I think the answer is we need to start a new game. And...we need some adjustment to the rules. To make combat more required or at least make there be some penalty for sending ships and just running away if you are not severely outgunned. Its one thing to have half his BPV. Its another to face...50 to 100 point difference and just run.

Anyway. Just need some modifications and this should make the game better. Maybe even make it where you cannot have more than 1 or two treaties. Based on simple reality. Obviously this would require the honor system. But realistically...if we always see no fights. And each side always gets their defend sites. Well that says something. We are ending up with just building bigger and bigger fleets that never get to fight. Pretty much a waste at this point since even with a monster fleet. If you are 100 points down the fight ends before it begins.

Chuck

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:32 PM joshua s via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>> wrote:
I’m sad to see you go. I really enjoyed your AAR’s. Both you and Paul have a gift!

Josh

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 28, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Boyd Steere via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>> wrote:

I've enjoyed this campaign a lot and learned so much about the game through it.  But I too look at my borders and conclude that it is now a game of long, allied borders generating floods of BPV from defense-only bidding, or engagements with fleets too giant for me to effectively play (especially as drone-heavy Kzinti).  I am ready to end my participation and say good game.

I understand that this condition is the result of my choices to make many alliances and few enemies.  Of course, my choices were influenced by having adversaries who also had large alliances and could thereby concentrate heavy fleets against me.

I will withdraw from all contested border engagements, of which there is now only one or two.  It's been fantastic playing with you, and I wish you all well!

Cheers,
Boyd, Territorial Marking Fleet


On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 8:31 AM Paul Meyer via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>> wrote:

For my two cents, I'm ready to start a new campaign. My borders and fleets are so big, I somehow forgot to deploy most of my capitol ships. With the majority of my cruisers and DNs in dock, I'll have to forfeit most of my scenarios this round.


More details to follow...


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>


________________________________
From: SFBdrama <sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org>> on behalf of Matthew via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 7:47 PM
To: sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: WoA

> ...  this type campaign because there is no real way to win.

Officially, you win by knocking everyone else out of the campaign
(through NOBORDER rewards.) In a practical sense, you win by being one
of the guys still standing whenever the game comes to a close.

> ... and Matt loves feed back

Indeed I do. There's half a dozen scenarios in the mix that someone else
made.

--Matt

____________________________________________________
Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
____________________________________________________
Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
____________________________________________________
Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
____________________________________________________
Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org<mailto:SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20181129/d2ab6a4b/attachment-0002.html>