Dramatic SFB: (S8.3) Deployment Patterns, escorts, and Interceptors.

[Gregory Flusche]

Yes I am really going to have to think about PFs for my Paravians. We do
have a few turns to go that way tho :)


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:55 PM, ken via SFBdrama <
sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:

> This will be new territory for me.  Most of the campaigns I have played
> have started in early general war.  I've never had one last long enough to
> deploy PFs.
>
> Admiral Ken
>
>
>
> Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note® 3
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Matthew via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Date: 12/14/2017 7:47 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: (S8.3) Deployment Patterns, escorts, and
> Interceptors.
>
>
> using (S8.0) Patrol Scenarios Conditions and Restriction in the Campaign,
> can the Players use the (S8.317) rule.
>
>
> Yes.
>
> I can also purchase Interceptors Y176, but it does not look like the
> Mech-Link refit on the Lyran ships is available till Y178. It does say in
> (R11.R3) There is some indication that a very few ships were fitted with
> mech-links to operate interceptors, but it is unclear if this was done
> after PFs were invented (to practice operational techniques) or prior
> toY178.
>
>
> I believe I gave everyone the mech link refit when they got Interceptors
> and intended to allow them to self-regulate (Interceptors and PFs increase
> the cost of ships enormously. Sometimes doubling the cost.)
>
> --Matt
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20171214/d8053de7/attachment-0002.html>