Dramatic SFB: Ready to rock and roll

[Michael Helbig]

I have a private message out to our esteemed moderator.  Once I have a
reply I'll be able to do my orders.

Michael
Director KGB forces

On Sat, Apr 11, 2020, 12:34 AM Matt via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
wrote:

>
> In the setup it states the tug will have "as many attached tug-appropriate
> cargo pods as it can carry".  For the Puma this is two pods.  However the
> victory conditions refer to the destruction of only a single cargo pod.
> Should I assume both pods have to be destroyed or only one of the two?  Or
> possibly just restrict the tug to having only one pod?
>
>
> The description is somewhat vague in order to accomodate those tugs that
> can only carry one pod (i.e. Hydrans) or those that can carry two (i.e.
> Klingons) or those that *must* carry two (i.e. ISC). What the scenario is
> attempting to reach for, is that there is no pod on the tug if they can
> only carry one or that there is a pod already mounted on the tug in a
> fashion as to allow the other to be attached directly.
>
> If the tug can only carry one pod, then any mention of a second pod
> [attached to the tug] is superfluous. Victory conditions to the effect of
> two pods destroyed/disengaged, are ignored and either side can only move
> the victory levels by one spot instead of two (due to pods. Other means are
> still in effect.)
>
>
> --Matt
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20200411/d04d97b5/attachment-0002.html>