Dramatic SFB: WoA Turn 12 - The GREAT GORN CONFEDERATION Ready to Advance

Gregory Flusche shagrat1960 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 8 11:03:37 PDT 2018


With that it means the paravians are retreating from 1952.

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Gregory Flusche <shagrat1960 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Message from the second in Command of the DN-001 to Death by Fire. Our
> commander Bird who has a Fervor has been arrested for his insane actions.
> We are leaving the system post haste.  We will be sending recompense for
> the dead pilots of your brave fighters. Please except are apologies for
> this insane action.
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And on a separate note...there are no Old style Command Ships for WER or
>> the KE that I am aware of.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well then I guess we get a ruling but they are size class 3. So....
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Gregory Flusche <shagrat1960 at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> ahh but it says ships of the class i do not think the WE KE can used
>>>> for the SUP..
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Greg...according to mine and anothers calculations...'the fleet is
>>>>> fine. Yes...the KE is just a cruiser. The DN is not a command ship...but
>>>>> needs escorts. So you have the Nova...which commands the two FFH...the SUP
>>>>> which commands the KE Eagle and WE, The RH which commands the Fleet, The
>>>>> KVUl which has all these ships as escorts...with the SKA, SKA and the tug
>>>>> in close escort.So since I have 2 size class 3s for the Nova and the
>>>>> SUP...the RH does not need to have any ships since the other command ships
>>>>> have their ships to command and the RH is the Flagship for the fleet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Gregory Flusche via SFBdrama <
>>>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No i do not want to lose any ships fighting that battle, Seeing ten
>>>>>> ships vs my 5 even if i have 6 little fighters. I am withdrawing from 1948
>>>>>> diplomatic immunity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for Remus Ascendant.  1952 organian treaty colony. you have what
>>>>>> seems to be three Command Cruisers? You can not have more then 1 CC unless
>>>>>> the other CC has its attendant CAs. I believe they would have to be FH-A
>>>>>> class?  Even if you could count the KE and WE that would still be one to
>>>>>> many CCs. Under the S8 rules we are using. I know that a KE under S8 is
>>>>>> considered CA not a CC.  Matt can you check and tell me if his fleet is
>>>>>> legal please?  there are 2 FFH Fast CA move cost 1 as well. There are
>>>>>> enough CAs For two but i Still think that they need to be the standard
>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Roch Chartrand via SFBdrama <
>>>>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unless the Paravian want to test my resolve in scenario #1948
>>>>>>> Diplomatic Immunity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As explained to TJ, I have a squadron that was wrongfully drop in a
>>>>>>> Fed Convey scenario, I believe that even if my squadron is illegal for this
>>>>>>> scenario due to movement cost, I would have to sit ships on the side in
>>>>>>> order to satisfy the limit.  But anyway my squadron will leave.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The GREAT GORN CONFEDERATION is ready to advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Garanti
>>>>>>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>>>> <#m_-5626150751519059083_m_3736146063161460550_m_-9010172311594429165_m_-1210266575641413157_m_-7501315487037409947_m_5073828866577284995_m_4573506784813730514_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20180808/b1734c32/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the SFBdrama mailing list