Dramatic SFB: WoA Turn 12 - The GREAT GORN CONFEDERATION Ready to Advance

[Charles Carroll]

And on a separate note...there are no Old style Command Ships for WER or
the KE that I am aware of.



On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well then I guess we get a ruling but they are size class 3. So....
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Gregory Flusche <shagrat1960 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ahh but it says ships of the class i do not think the WE KE can used for
>> the SUP..
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Charles Carroll <mastrvran at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greg...according to mine and anothers calculations...'the fleet is fine.
>>> Yes...the KE is just a cruiser. The DN is not a command ship...but needs
>>> escorts. So you have the Nova...which commands the two FFH...the SUP which
>>> commands the KE Eagle and WE, The RH which commands the Fleet, The KVUl
>>> which has all these ships as escorts...with the SKA, SKA and the tug in
>>> close escort.So since I have 2 size class 3s for the Nova and the SUP...the
>>> RH does not need to have any ships since the other command ships have their
>>> ships to command and the RH is the Flagship for the fleet.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Gregory Flusche via SFBdrama <
>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No i do not want to lose any ships fighting that battle, Seeing ten
>>>> ships vs my 5 even if i have 6 little fighters. I am withdrawing from 1948
>>>> diplomatic immunity.
>>>>
>>>> As for Remus Ascendant.  1952 organian treaty colony. you have what
>>>> seems to be three Command Cruisers? You can not have more then 1 CC unless
>>>> the other CC has its attendant CAs. I believe they would have to be FH-A
>>>> class?  Even if you could count the KE and WE that would still be one to
>>>> many CCs. Under the S8 rules we are using. I know that a KE under S8 is
>>>> considered CA not a CC.  Matt can you check and tell me if his fleet is
>>>> legal please?  there are 2 FFH Fast CA move cost 1 as well. There are
>>>> enough CAs For two but i Still think that they need to be the standard
>>>> version?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Roch Chartrand via SFBdrama <
>>>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unless the Paravian want to test my resolve in scenario #1948
>>>>> Diplomatic Immunity
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As explained to TJ, I have a squadron that was wrongfully drop in a
>>>>> Fed Convey scenario, I believe that even if my squadron is illegal for this
>>>>> scenario due to movement cost, I would have to sit ships on the side in
>>>>> order to satisfy the limit.  But anyway my squadron will leave.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The GREAT GORN CONFEDERATION is ready to advance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Garanti
>>>>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>> <#m_-9010172311594429165_m_-1210266575641413157_m_-7501315487037409947_m_5073828866577284995_m_4573506784813730514_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>>>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>>>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>>>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20180727/03f8a4bf/attachment-0002.html>