Dramatic SFB: SFBdrama Digest, Vol 9, Issue 14

[Gregory Flusche]

Race picks for me are Paravian then Rom,

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:33 PM, <sfbdrama-request at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:

> Send SFBdrama mailing list submissions to
>         sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         sfbdrama-request at lists.mattnet.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         sfbdrama-owner at lists.mattnet.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SFBdrama digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Campaign Situation (Ann Monaghan)
>    2. Campaign Tweaks (Matthew)
>    3. SUMO VOTES (Glenn Somerfield)
>    4. Re: Early Voting Counts (Roch Chartrand)
>    5. Re: Campaign Tweaks (Roch Chartrand)
>    6. Re: Early Voting Counts (joshua s)
>    7. Thanks for the Fun (Peter S. DiMitri)
>    8. Voting (TheContinuingMisadventure)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:25:12 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ann Monaghan <lemay.frank at bell.net>
> To: Matthew <matt at mattnet.org>,  Matthew via SFBdrama
>         <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: Campaign Situation
> Message-ID:
>         <925454744.2423782.1507937112070.JavaMail.open-xchange at mtlgui05>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.
> org/attachments/20171013/fe8de589/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 01:40:07 -0400
> From: Matthew <matt at mattnet.org>
> To: Matthew via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Dramatic SFB: Campaign Tweaks
> Message-ID: <280f11b9-eec0-a660-923a-f87fd493f541 at mattnet.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> On 10/10/2017 06:54 PM, Ann Monaghan wrote:
> > Make it an option where both Admirals must agree to use hidden TBs, if
> > one says no, then hidden TBs is not used.
>
> The campaign rules have stated
> <http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org/docs/rules.html#sfb%20rules> that we are
> using the Secret Placement of Mines (M2.6). I'll mention that the rule
> allows mines laid out the hatch to be secret (you do this in the client
> by making the mine "hidden" in the dialog during placement) but does not
> allow mines delivered by transporter to be secret. If the players want
> to change this, then the rules make all mines public. There will not be
> a "middle ground". where the players decide differently for each
> scenario. One way or the other, guys.
>
> --Matt
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.
> org/attachments/20171015/f1dc6549/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Glenn Somerfield <glenns134 at yahoo.com>
> To: Matthew via SFBdrama <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Dramatic SFB: SUMO VOTES
> Message-ID: <126674776.157651.1508065389083 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> early year start
> Hydran / Lyran?
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.
> org/attachments/20171015/2a5362e1/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:22:00 -0400
> From: "Roch Chartrand" <R.Chartrand at Videotron.qc.ca>
> To: "'Matthew'" <matt at mattnet.org>
> Cc: <SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: Early Voting Counts
> Message-ID: <02a201d345c0$f81af530$e850df90$@Videotron.qc.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="UTF-8"
>
> Gents,
>
> Oh, did not see we were also submitting our wish list for race.  For start
> date it's already in.
>
> As said in previous email, my first pick is Gorn. If not possible here is
> some alternate choice for :
>
> My wish or pick for race is (in order of preference):
> 1. Gorn
> 2. Fed
> 3. ISC
> 4. KZinty
>
> Comment on T-Bombs
>
> I don't mind if the T-bomb that are roll out from the hatch are hidden (no
> energy involve for this action), but the one transported should not because
> (energy is needed to do so, and it can be pick up from all the ship
> detecting apparatus)
>
> Roch C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SFBdrama [mailto:sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org] On Behalf Of
> Matthew via SFBdrama
> Sent: 14 octobre 2017 21:54
> To: Matthew via SFBdrama
> Subject: Dramatic SFB: Early Voting Counts
>
> So I have these votes:
>
> 2 EY and some secondary-preference votes
>
> 5 mid-war (continue where we left off)
>
> 3 GW era
>
> 1 Abstain
>
>
> And these empire picks, in order of preference
>
> Rob: Tholian, Hydran
>
> Roch:
>
> Greg:
>
> Paul: Gorn
>
> Daniel:
>
> Ken:
>
> Micheal: Carnivon
>
> Steven:
>
> Josh:
>
> Pat: Fed (Fighters? or PFs?), Klingon
>
>
> Voting has not yet closed. People listed have voted. Those with empire
> picks
> have simply gotten in their picks early. Changes can be made to any of the
> above. If you aren't listed, then I have not tabulated your vote and you
> should remind me to do so. Due to the ratio of players-to-available-empires
> (18 players to 19 empires - some empires being unplayable in some eras), we
> will again allow up to two people to play the same empire. Picking an
> empire
> to play is not necessary at this point, as the era we pick may invalidate
> some empires.
>
>
> --Matt
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
>
> ---
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier ?lectronique a ?t? v?rifi?e par le
> logiciel antivirus Avast.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:24:26 -0400
> From: "Roch Chartrand" <R.Chartrand at Videotron.qc.ca>
> To: "'Matthew'" <matt at mattnet.org>
> Cc: <SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: Campaign Tweaks
> Message-ID: <02a301d345c1$4eaf6ac0$ec0e4040$@Videotron.qc.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I'm good with this, it meet my thinking on the subject!
>
>
>
> Roch C.
>
>
>
> From: SFBdrama [mailto:sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org] On Behalf Of
> Matthew via SFBdrama
> Sent: 15 octobre 2017 01:40
> To: Matthew via SFBdrama
> Subject: Dramatic SFB: Campaign Tweaks
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2017 06:54 PM, Ann Monaghan wrote:
>
>
>
> Make it an option where both Admirals must agree to use hidden TBs, if one
> says no, then hidden TBs is not used.
>
>
> The campaign rules have stated
> <http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org/docs/rules.html#sfb%20rules>  that we are
> using
> the Secret Placement of Mines (M2.6). I'll mention that the rule allows
> mines laid out the hatch to be secret (you do this in the client by making
> the mine "hidden" in the dialog during placement) but does not allow mines
> delivered by transporter to be secret. If the players want to change this,
> then the rules make all mines public. There will not be a "middle ground".
> where the players decide differently for each scenario. One way or the
> other, guys.
>
> --Matt
>
>
>
> ---
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier ?lectronique a ?t? v?rifi?e par le
> logiciel antivirus Avast.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.
> org/attachments/20171015/31263fa2/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:29:25 +0000
> From: joshua s <badreligiontrk07 at hotmail.com>
> To: Matthew <matt at mattnet.org>
> Cc: "sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org" <sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Re: Dramatic SFB: Early Voting Counts
> Message-ID:
>         <CY4PR1301MB2069AFBCBADFB5DD8420ED79DF4E0 at CY4PR1301MB2069.
> namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I too am new, in fact this my 2nd campaign ever. I'll also apologize now
> for the multitude of rules errors I'll make playing since I'm not that
> familiar with them.
>
> I'm not sure if you got my era vote but I'd prefer General War around
> Y166. I don't have early eras but willing to get it if that is chosen.
>
> T-Bombs: hidden laid from hatch is fine. I was under the impression that
> using transporters is known by all ships within 35 hexes.
>
> Empire pick: I prefer a crunch race in no particular order Andromedans,
> Hydrans, or Feds (3rd way). I understand that Andros are not available
> prior to Y166, feel free to disregard them if an earlier era is chosen.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh(blackwind)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 15, 2017, at 7:22 AM, Roch Chartrand via SFBdrama <
> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
> >
> > Gents,
> >
> > Oh, did not see we were also submitting our wish list for race.  For
> start
> > date it's already in.
> >
> > As said in previous email, my first pick is Gorn. If not possible here is
> > some alternate choice for :
> >
> > My wish or pick for race is (in order of preference):
> > 1. Gorn
> > 2. Fed
> > 3. ISC
> > 4. KZinty
> >
> > Comment on T-Bombs
> >
> > I don't mind if the T-bomb that are roll out from the hatch are hidden
> (no
> > energy involve for this action), but the one transported should not
> because
> > (energy is needed to do so, and it can be pick up from all the ship
> > detecting apparatus)
> >
> > Roch C.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SFBdrama [mailto:sfbdrama-bounces at lists.mattnet.org] On Behalf Of
> > Matthew via SFBdrama
> > Sent: 14 octobre 2017 21:54
> > To: Matthew via SFBdrama
> > Subject: Dramatic SFB: Early Voting Counts
> >
> > So I have these votes:
> >
> > 2 EY and some secondary-preference votes
> >
> > 5 mid-war (continue where we left off)
> >
> > 3 GW era
> >
> > 1 Abstain
> >
> >
> > And these empire picks, in order of preference
> >
> > Rob: Tholian, Hydran
> >
> > Roch:
> >
> > Greg:
> >
> > Paul: Gorn
> >
> > Daniel:
> >
> > Ken:
> >
> > Micheal: Carnivon
> >
> > Steven:
> >
> > Josh:
> >
> > Pat: Fed (Fighters? or PFs?), Klingon
> >
> >
> > Voting has not yet closed. People listed have voted. Those with empire
> picks
> > have simply gotten in their picks early. Changes can be made to any of
> the
> > above. If you aren't listed, then I have not tabulated your vote and you
> > should remind me to do so. Due to the ratio of
> players-to-available-empires
> > (18 players to 19 empires - some empires being unplayable in some eras),
> we
> > will again allow up to two people to play the same empire. Picking an
> empire
> > to play is not necessary at this point, as the era we pick may invalidate
> > some empires.
> >
> >
> > --Matt
> >
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> > http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> > SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> > http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
> >
> >
> > ---
> > L'absence de virus dans ce courrier ?lectronique a ?t? v?rifi?e par le
> logiciel antivirus Avast.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> > http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> > SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> > http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:43:01 -0400
> From: "Peter S. DiMitri" <pdimitri at verizon.net>
> To: <SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org>
> Subject: Dramatic SFB: Thanks for the Fun
> Message-ID: <000701d345dd$0c6dd590$254980b0$@verizon.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ironically, I was going to announce a few weeks ago that despite the fun I
> was having, real life is currently too demanding for me to participate in
> this game.
>
>
>
> So, the breakpoint came at a good time for me.  I hope maybe next year I
> can
> play again (assuming there is game going on at that point).
>
>
>
> Is there a way I can get all of these e-mails to stop coming?
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.
> org/attachments/20171015/ea23b1da/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 16:50:04 -0400
> From: TheContinuingMisadventure <steerenicholas at gmail.com>
> To: sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> Subject: Dramatic SFB: Voting
> Message-ID:
>         <CABnUSRtLtTvDzBXaq7BurTxwh3p-Z4XTNN=zovMUuitieDgnCA at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Era: Dawn of Warp
> Empire: Klingon if we do choose Dawn of Warp starting date, Lyran if
> anything else.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.
> org/attachments/20171015/bdc3a6f9/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> <a href='sfbdrama.mattnet.org'>Dramatic SFB</a> campaign chatter list
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of SFBdrama Digest, Vol 9, Issue 14
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20171015/97b7299f/attachment.html>