<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp4d7fd177yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Peladine update Scenario 2188,</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Peladine lost the DW "Yayoi", the Klingon lost the F5K, and the F5D, and F5L both crippled, the FRD undamaged, DW "Ekron", and FFS "Yamatai" disengaged (Klingon win).</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">A good game with Brents Klingons, a well fought battle.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Peladine scenario 2199 vs the ISC,</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I am going to try to disengage from gathering probes on the ISC front (I am happy to do the battle using Matts alternative combat system).</div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="yahoo_quoted_0008295677" class="yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020, 07:44:24 pm AEST, Majead Farsi <majeadfarsi@googlemail.com> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="yiv7643356603"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>yep! That one I will get my ass kicked to the otherside of the galaxy! Well outgunned and even on an equal fleet very difficult to stop u from getting 1 ship there for 1 impulse!</div><div>The freighter one is more of an equal battle but you are up there too! I'm trying to see if there is any way to save the freighters as they are so slow and your QWT will catch them for certain! Not looking good for those Freighter captains 😀<br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div></div><br clear="none"><div class="yiv7643356603yqt5181821348" id="yiv7643356603yqt84761"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 09:16, Don Lavanty <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:emeketos@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:emeketos@gmail.com">emeketos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="ltr">yeah for that fight I need to seriously evaluate if its worth it.<div><br clear="none"></div><div>I am game for the Freighter one, I was very surprised you fit a carrier in with the move/side limitation I think I have the upper hand in that fight but I am not sure by how much. you have an actual squadron of 8 vs my casual 6(3x2) plus the interceptors.</div><div> assume you are exiting stage left on the overwhelming.</div></div><br clear="none"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:06 AM Majead Farsi <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:majeadfarsi@googlemail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:majeadfarsi@googlemail.com">majeadfarsi@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="ltr"><div>More like 300 more than yours! I will be fighting this one! As I'm well up here in fire power! Encounter #2116 I'm not fighting that one as I'm well outgunned!! #2115 I'm still debating if there is a way of saving the freighters. will let you know on that one!</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>Majead<br clear="none"></div></div><br clear="none"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 08:38, Don Lavanty <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:emeketos@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:emeketos@gmail.com">emeketos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="ltr">Trust me I find fighting Carnivon's very dangerous those disruptor cannons are nasty. His force does include a CV group but I have 6 interceptors included<div><br clear="none"></div><div>Carnivon have</div><div>CWL, 2xCW, CWB, DWS, 2xDWA, CVS 12 fighters(JK-4 & HY-3), ISC CC w// int's</div><div>vs my Paravian</div><div>CWL, 3xCW, RMS w/ 2p-b&p-sd w/ ints, BCH w/ Ints, DWL w/ int's</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>his force is at least 100bp more than mine.</div><div><br clear="none"></div></div><br clear="none"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote"><div class="yiv7643356603gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:52 AM Wayne Power via SFBdrama <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org">sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote class="yiv7643356603gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;"><div><div style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div></div>
<div><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr">You would need to battle in a fleet, with some heavy ships, to take that Paravian force on. </div>
</div><div id="yiv7643356603gmail-m_-6335310596981188067gmail-m_-5575912946643948497gmail-m_8849465438674157390gmail-m_-2984719296975928247gmail-m_-6104447832644794458yahoo_quoted_9588801347">
<div style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(38,40,42);">
<div>
On Monday, 7 September 2020, 09:38:20 am AEST, Gregory Flusche via SFBdrama <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org">sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org</a>> wrote:
</div>
<div><br clear="none"></div>
<div><br clear="none"></div>
<div><div id="yiv7643356603gmail-m_-6335310596981188067gmail-m_-5575912946643948497gmail-m_8849465438674157390gmail-m_-2984719296975928247gmail-m_-6104447832644794458yiv9281524814"><div><div dir="ltr">Yes looks legal to me as well </div><br clear="none"><div id="yiv7643356603gmail-m_-6335310596981188067gmail-m_-5575912946643948497gmail-m_8849465438674157390gmail-m_-2984719296975928247gmail-m_-6104447832644794458yiv9281524814yqt60698"><div><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 6:09 PM Matt via SFBdrama <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org">sfbdrama@lists.mattnet.org</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;"><br clear="none">
> He has a total of 7 ships with 4 command type/ Leader equivalent ships <br clear="none">
> ( they have Flag bridges etc!). Is this Fleet legal or has he got too <br clear="none">
> many leaders/ Command ships. His ships are :<br clear="none">
> CWL, CW, CW, CW, RMS (with 3 pods), BCH, DWL.<br clear="none">
> To be honest it's the DWL that looks as if it should not be there by <br clear="none">
> itself as there are no SC 4 ships to lead!<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Flag bridge does not necessarily make it a leader variant. For example, <br clear="none">
starbases (S8.27) and some Lyran ships (R11.5). Even leader variants <br clear="none">
don't always have flag bridge - see most DWLs and FLGs. As near as I <br clear="none">
figure, leader variants are marked as such only on the SSD (though <br clear="none">
looking at higher-than-normal Command Ratings for the class can be an <br clear="none">
indicator. Unfortunately, that also captures some PFTs and carriers.) <br clear="none">
See (S8.36); it begins with the most complete definition of a leader <br clear="none">
variant that is off the top of my head.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
The RMS (regardless of the number of pods) counts as a Size-Class 2 <br clear="none">
ship. As such, it counts under (S8.331). One would think that (S8.363) <br clear="none">
applies to keep it from being considered as a leader, but the RMS is <br clear="none">
actually a dreadnaught-sized tug variant - which is still not a leader <br clear="none">
variant. (note that the tug pods are never applied against a flagship's <br clear="none">
command rating.)<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
The BCH very much is under (S8.333). This also excludes it from being <br clear="none">
considered a leader variant. This also allows the BCH to be included, <br clear="none">
specifically regardless of the inclusion of a Size-Class 2 unit.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
So per (S8.36), the consideration of leader variants falls to the CWL <br clear="none">
and the DWL. The CWL is leading a full squadron of CWs, allowing the DWL <br clear="none">
to be included under (S8.361).<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
The above fleet appears legal to me.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
--Matt<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
____________________________________________________<br clear="none">
Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list<br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org">http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org</a><br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org">SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org</a><br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org">http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org</a><br clear="none">
</blockquote></div></div></div></div><div id="yiv7643356603gmail-m_-6335310596981188067gmail-m_-5575912946643948497gmail-m_8849465438674157390gmail-m_-2984719296975928247gmail-m_-6104447832644794458yqt36526">____________________________________________________<br clear="none">Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list<br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org">http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org</a><br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org">SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org</a><br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org">http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org</a><br clear="none"></div></div>
</div>
</div></div>____________________________________________________<br clear="none">
Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list<br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org">http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org</a><br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org">SFBdrama@lists.mattnet.org</a><br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org">http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org</a><br clear="none">
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>