Dramatic SFB: Torpedo Boats

[Don Lavanty]

Last message I got from the ISC was  when he thought his fleet was legal
said he would offer fight vs his Overwhelming force. His adjusted legal max
fleet shifted the power about 200% towards the attacker me. It was
Determined he could bring max his CA  + INT's and a CA + intercepters.

VS my BCH w/ PF's (not ints),  BC w/ PF's  and as HDD+ all with the SABOT
refit.  Thats 5 S torps 5 F Torps on the ship with SABOT refit and 4 PF's
with 4 F torp's each all against a stationary target. (5 S-Torp's, 20 F
Torps) There are not enough WW's in the world to avoid that much plasma.

I am not going to let an chance to get an early kill on a ship so yes I am
fighting. Which mean's Weapon Status roll or mark one CA destroyed and then
retreat.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Randy Blair via SFBdrama <
sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:

> How 'bout you take a sip out of a tall drink of chill the fuck out.
> Since this campaign takes a month or more to resolve a single goddamned
> turn, it has become far less of a priority for me to read all the emails I
> get about it.
> Klingons are RTA as I have already said.
> You are not waiting on me, so STFU.
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 4:40 PM Paul Graves <paulgraves at sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>> What are you talking about Randy?
>>
>> Wayne copied the conversation below.  That's your email on June 28 where
>> you say you're not sure you still have a battle and Wayne responds with a
>> copy of Steven's email on *JUNE 11* saying the Lyrans disengaged so your
>> Klingons won.  So what do you mean you weren't part of that conversation?
>>
>> So to recap, you were notified June 11 that you won Refit Raid 3967 by
>> Steven's email.
>> Then it was all brought up again on June 28 as mentioned below in a chain
>> of several emails of which you were a part.
>> Now it's brought up again yesterday July 9 by another chain of emails.
>> Same conversation, same resolution, and you even won the scenario.
>>
>> I wouldn't make an issue of this at all except you were one of the most
>> vociferous complainers about how slow the scenario was running at the
>> beginning.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 10, 2019, 01:59:41 AM PDT, Randy Blair <
>> randyblair2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's you.
>> I was not part of that conversation.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 1:58 AM Paul Graves <paulgraves at sbcglobal.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Deja vu?  Is it just me or did we have this entire conversation a few
>> weeks ago, from all the same people...
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, 08:52:41 PM PDT, Wayne Power via SFBdrama <
>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This message has been sent in an earlier post,
>> #3967 Refit Raid Lyran v Klingon, I was the battle captain for the
>> Klingon. The Lyrans disengaged and left the field to the Klingons (from
>> email: Steven Pow, on June 11 Tuesday, 23:16, that he will be withdrawing
>> from #3967 Refit Raid.
>> (The Lyran ships disengaged, your Klingoon forces win the field)
>> On Friday, 28 June 2019, 12:12:38 pm AEST, <wdpower at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>> #3967 Refit Raid Lyran v Klingon, I was the battle captain for the
>> Klingon. The Lyrans disengaged and left the field to the Klingons (from
>> email: Steven Pow, on June 11 Tuesday, 23:16, that he will be withdrawing
>> from #3967 Refit Raid.
>> On Friday, 28 June 2019, 11:19:53 am AEST, Randy Blair via SFBdrama <
>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have a battle, I think.
>> Not sure if my battle Captain won or not.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 9:18 PM Matt via SFBdrama <
>> sfbdrama at lists.mattnet.org> wrote:
>>
>> So how are we doing in the Torpedo Boat war? Four people are left to hit
>> the button.
>>
>>
>> I've got a potential battle with Sumo, but I technically outgun him. I
>> haven't heard if he is backing away there, but I probably missed the
>> email.
>>
>>
>> --Matt
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
>> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
>> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
>> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
> Dramatic SFB campaign chatter list
> http://sfbdrama.mattnet.org
> SFBdrama at lists.mattnet.org
> http://lists.mattnet.org/listinfo.cgi/sfbdrama-mattnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mattnet.org/pipermail/sfbdrama-mattnet.org/attachments/20190711/a1850844/attachment-0002.html>